2010 years anniversary of Great Illyrian Revolt. Erupted on 6 AD
The publication is targeted primarily to colleagues reenactors from the ancient Roman period.
It's a little known event which is not very popular among fans of ancient history. I pay particular attention to this round anniversary because there is evidence that the legion which we recreate LEGIO IIII SCYTHICA participated in military operations related to its suppression as well the consequences of this revolt significantly affect the attitude of Imperial Rome in its future behavior toward the Roman Limes.
We should not forget that this is happening in perhaps the most romantic period of the Roman Empire during the reign of Emperor Augustus.
This period inspired many writers and producers to be creative in this period and create emblematic works such as novels and movie productions.
Of course there is many comprehensive publications on the matter which I will quote here as I will not be fully comprehensive because not all details in the publications are important for the topic. I will focus myself on the reasons for the outbreak of the uprising,legionnaires equipment,the military operations and the consequences associated with it.
Last but not least is interesting and descriptions of the involvement of the Thracian auxiliary areas, at this time Thracian tribes were vassal of Rome and the fact that Remetalk the first sent significant army to support the Roman legions talks about loyalty to the Thracian tribes to ROME at this period.
The situation has changed when reinforcements began to arrive from limes along the middle and lower stream of the Danube. From Naissus / Nis / arrived 5 legions : IV Scythica, V Macedonica, VII Paterna, VIII Augusta and XI-th/, led by Cecilia North and Plautius Silvanus and Thracian cavalry sent by the king Remetalk (which I mentioned above).
Trophy which depicts defeated Dalmatians and Pannonian, with different weapon and armor. Most likely dedicated to Tiberius in case of suppression of the Great Illyrian Revolt.
Published in the book “Finds of the Roman Military Equipment in Croatia. Editor: Ivan Radman-Livaja”
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
I will begin with citation regarding participation of our Legion IIII Scythica in The Great Illyrian Revolt from:
The Archaeology of Roman Southern Pannonia by Ivan Radman :
“The state of research and selected problems in the Croatian part of the Roman province of Pannonia”
www.academia.edu
“Wilkes assumed that VII, VIII Augusta and XI legion could have been
under the command of Caecina Severus at that time, while IV Scythica and V Macedonica
came from the East, but not all authors agree with this opinion...
… IV Scythica was probably one of Caecina’s legions, because it seems to have been permanently stationed in Moesia during the ruleof Augustus.
… We can assume that these were Tiberius’ IX, XIII, XIV, XV and XX,as well as
IV Scythica, V Macedonica , VII, VIII and XI that arrived from Moesia…”
Map of The great Illyrian rebellion 6,9 AD 
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Comprehensive quote from publication:Archaeological Traces of the Pannonian Revolt 6 –9 AD:
Evidence and Conjectures*
Ivan Radman-Livaja – Marko Dizdar
“Sed nuntiata Illyrici defectione transiit ad curam novi belli, quod gravissimum omnium externorum bellorum post Punica, per quindecim legiones paremque auxiliorum copiam triennio gessit in magnis omnium rerum difficultatibus summaque frugum inopia1.”
With these words, Suetonius did not leave us much information about the Pannonian revolt but one must admit that this dramatic sentence gives to the modern reader a rather clear idea how the Romans themselves perceived that war. One might argue that Suetonius was prone to exaggeration and that it is unlikely that the Pannonian and Dalmatian insurgents ever represented a real threat to the Italian mainland.
Nevertheless, considering the manpower and the material resources engaged to quell the revolt, one cannot deny that Augustus took that threat very seriously. The gravity of the situation in 6 AD is after all confirmed by other sources, most notably by one historian who personally took part in that war, Velleius Paterculus, who also claims that the rebel forces, which according to his estimates numbered hundreds of thousands of men, planned to launch an offensive against Italy2. It would thus appear that this belief was widespread among Romans at that time.
When the revolt began in 6 AD and when the grim news reached Rome,the authorities as well as the Italian population probably shared the belief that a large host of Illyrian barbarians was heading towards Rome and that desperate measures were to be taken in order to save Italy.
One should not underestimate the strength of rumours, which could easily and rapidly spread over a large area, causing panic among civilians and military alike. The troops raised by Pannonian and Dalmatian insurgents could certainly not match in any way the army led by Hannibal but in the eyes of the Italian population it was the first time after two centuries that a foreign enemy seemed to be strong enough to defeat Roman legions and march towards Rome.
This is why Suetonius’ comparison is actually quite pertinent and understandable…”
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Comprehensive quote from publication: The Archaeology of Roman Southern Pannonia
The state of research and selected problems in the Croatian part of the Roman province of Pannonia Ivan Radman-Livaja
Edited by: Branka Migotti
„The news on the uprising in Illyricum reached Tiberius’s headquarters in Carnuntum just before the beginning of the war against the Marcomanni in AD 6. The timing of the uprising was perfect because the greater part of the Roman troops stationed in Illyricum was temporarily deployed in the north under the command of Tiberius, so that they could participate in the mentioned campaign. The Daesidiates were joined by the Breuci, probably the strongest tribe in southern Pannonia, led by another Bato. Many smaller tribes also joined the rebels and they embarked on an all round massacre of the Roman citizens in the area. Velleius expressly mentions traders and military units who had the bad luck to be caught isolated in the midst of what had suddenly become an enemy territory. The rebels did not stop at killing all the Romans they could lay their hands on, but immediately moved on to larger settlements and even neighbouring provinces. Velleius make only a passing mention of the looting raids toward Macedonia and the preparations for the attack against Italy, but Cassius Dio explicitly mentions the attacks against Salona and Sirmium. It seems, therefore, that the rebels’ plans were far more ambitious and far-reaching than merely killing and expelling the Romans from their tribal areas. Considering the circumstances, the Roman reaction was quick and quite effective. The Romans who happened to be in the settlements taken by the rebels could not, of course, be helped, and their fate certainly contributed to the panic that spread all the way to Italy…. Dio’s description does not make it quite clear whether Caecina Severus broke the siege of Sirmium or whether he actually stopped the Breuci from approaching Sirmium, because the author explicitly states that Caecina Severus defeated the Breuci at the Drava River, which is quite a distance from Sirmium. It is possible that Caecina Severus broke the siege of the town and then drove the attackers to the Drava, where the Breuci decided to confront them in the battleield,and were eventually defeated. Salona was besieged by the Daesidiates, but the town was well defended so the majority of the rebel army, headed by its wounded leader Bato, withdrew to the hinterland, although looters continued to raid hte ocastal raea lal hte way ot Apolonia. According ot the written sources, the rebels soon embarked on another offensive, despite their defeat. After abandoning the siege of Salona, the Daesidiates tried to intercept the troops of Valerius Messala, but the Romans, although outnumbered, managed to defeat them. These were probably the troops that Tiberius had sent as reinforcements to Siscia, but it is not clear whether they were attacked on their way to Siscia or only after they had set up camp there and then embarked on an attack against the rebels. This defeat did not discourage the Daesidiates, as they headed east to meet set off for Sirmium. They set up camp on Alma Mons (Fruška gora in Syrmia), where they began preparations for the attack against Sirmium.
Caecina Severus, probably a very capable commander, sent the allied Thracian cavalry against them, led by king Rhoemetalces, in order to prevent them from attacking Sirmium. The Thracians succeeded and they drove off the rebels thus concluding the last big military operation in AD 6. At the year’s end the Romans were in possession of the two most important towns: Siscia,defended by Tiberius’ troops with reinforcements from Italy,and Sirmium, controlled by the army of Caecina Severus, as well as in control of the coastal towns.
The rebels obviously controlled the entire territory in between, but the Romans deinitely had the strategic advantage and they seemed to have believed that in the spring they would be able to crush the rebellion, owing to the numerous forces they had gathered. They started an offensive in AD 7, probably as soon as the weather conditions permitted. Three Moesian legions under Caecina Severus, two legions redeployedfrom Asia Minor led by Marcus Plautius Silvanus, 52 and the Thracian cavalry led by king Rhoemetalces, set off for Siscia from Sirmium, no doubt to secure the Sava River, the main communication route across Illyricum.
The Romans, whose numbers gave them great confidence, probably were not too cautious and fell into an ambush in the marshy area known as Hiulca Palus (but also as Volcae Paludes), somewhere in today’s south-eastern Slavonia. Despite their heavy losses they managed to break through and make it to Siscia, where the largest Roman military force since the time of the Civil Wars had just gathered.53 As such a large concentration of troops probably created logistical problems, some of the troops were sent again to Moesia where their presence was, after all, needed because of the Dacian and Sarmatian looting raids…”
52 Wilkes assumed that VII, VIII Augusta and XI legion could have been
under the command of Caecina Severus at that time, while IV Scythica
and V Macedonica came from the East, but not all authors agree with this
opinion. There are even doubts as to whether Caecina Severus took all
three Moesian legions along on this campaign, and only two legions in
Caecina’s and Plautius’s joint forces are assumed to have actually been
Moesian. IV Scythica was probably one of Caecina’s legions, because
it seems to have been permanently stationed in Moesia during the rule
of Augustus. V Macedonica and the VII legion were most probably
transferred from Galatia under the command of Plautius Silvanus, but the
question of the VIII and XI legion remains open. As for the VIII legion,
depending on the author in question, it is assumed that it may have been
stationed in Illyricum, Moesia, in the East, in northern Africa or Egypt,
while the XI legion was most probably stationed in the Balkans at the
time in question, but it is impossible to say exactly where. Plautius’s third
legion (if the assumption on three Eastern legions is correct in the irst
place) could perhaps be the VIII legion, but it could also have been one
of the 3 Moesian legions, together with the IV and XI. The question also
remains open as to the legion that Caecina Severus could have perhaps
left behind in Moesia;
http://peter.mackenzie.org
The Romans soon captured one Illyrian city after another, eventually besieging Andetrium, where Bato the Daesitiate and his forces were positioned. After heavy casualties on both sides, Tiberius finally succeeded in taking the city.
The final resistance took place in the city of Arduba. As the Roman legions were storming the city walls, the women threw themselves and their children into the fire that had engulfed the city. Facing defeat, Bato the Daesitiate surrendered to the Roman in 9 AD, asking for lives of his warriors to be spared. Asked by Tiberius why he had revolted against him, Bato the Daesitiate answered: "You Romans are alone to blame because you sent the wolves to guard your flocks and not shepherds." Bato the Daesitiate was finally sent to live in exile in Ravenna.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
… What can we say after this short survey and can any conclusion be reached at all? The answer is not an easy one…One must admit that the available archaeological evidence for the Pannonian revolt is scant at best, especially when we compare it to the data gathered in Germany for the same period.
The only way to improve our knowledge is to increase research in that particular field. A thorough prospection of given areas might permit us to find other Roman camps.
The Roman conquest of southern Pannonia and the early period of Romanization of that area are an exciting field of research and one can only hope that we will not have to wait too long before increasing considerably our knowledge about that fascinating period.
The remarkable thing are the huge army that is dislocated in this province!This happened for the first time since the aftermath of the Battle of Cannae two centuries earlier. At one moment, in the winter AD 6-7, 10 legions were deployed and an equivalent number of auxilia (70 cohortes, 10 alae and more than 10,000 veterans) In addition, they were assisted by a large number of Thracian troops deployed by their king Rhoemetalces, a Roman amicus (ally)—a grand total of some 100,000 men.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Once this is a publication aimed primarily to the reenactment society. Hoping to be noticed by the responsible public officials of countries got involved in this affair: Croatia, Slovenia and Serbia on which territory mainly are develop these important ancient history events. I will present and appropriate equipment that should be used by participants in a eventual event.Of course I can not be completely comprehensive because it is impossible in such publications. But with these pictures and explanations (I hope) I will give the correct directions. These are most relevant personages of legionnaire from Augusta Tiberius period. The first quarter of the first century A.D.
Appropriate helmets:
Hagenau type helmets are not the only type of Roman helmets found in Sisak. Two Weisenau type helmets discovered in the Kupa river at Sisak could perhaps belong to an early period. Both can broadly be dated to the first half of the 1st century AD, but it is not easy to date them more precisely within that time period. Nevertheless it is not entirely unlikely that they could have been manufactured at the beginning of the century. One, although quite damaged,still shows traces of a lavish decoration (fig. 6).
Both the Rugvica and Bok helmet find their analogies with the Hagenau type helmet from Haltern and it is therefore not unlikely that both were worn by soldiers who fought against the Pannonian rebels from 6 to 9 AD 7. The second helmet is better preserved but shows no traces of rich decoration (fig. 7). H. R. Robinson dated it to the first quarter of the 1st century AD, but the developed neck guard of this helmet incites us to be more prudent in dating. However, one can not dismiss the possibility that it is a late Augustan mode.
Quote from publication:Archaeological Traces of the Pannonian Revolt 6 –9 AD:
Evidence and Conjectures*
Ivan Radman-Livaja – Marko Dizdar
Centurio helmet from Sisak, Croatia
This helmet has been used from centurion in the time of the Pannonian uprising war and was most likely lost during military actions in forcing the Kupa river.
“Despite being numerous,
the finds from Sisak are perhaps the least likely to
be connected with any certainty to the Pannonian
revolt from 6 to 9 AD. It is not due to chronological
issues because we believe that all of them might
have been in use during the Pannonian
revolt. It
should also be pointed out that we did not mention
many finds from Siscia whose dating is more uncertain
or very broad, like spears, javelins, arrows, lead
shots, fragments of chain and scale armour, harness
equipment pieces, etc., although
they could have
been used during the Pannonian
war as well. The
problem with finds from Siscia, or we should better
say the difficulty of connecting
finds from Siscia to
the Pannonian revolt lies in the fact that this place
was an important military garrison from 35 BC till
at least 43 AD when the 9th legion left for Britain. “
citation (Archaeological Museum,
zagreb; photo courtesy
Prof Radman-Livaja)
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
More information on this helmet and the story of its creation:
http://legio-iiii-scythica.com
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Some of the Coolus helmets recommended for this period.
Quote from publication:Archaeological Traces of the Pannonian Revolt 6 –9 AD:
Evidence and Conjectures*
Ivan Radman-Livaja – Marko Dizdar
The Obrežje camp is placed close to the Sava river and among other tasks it must have been used to protect and control the supply line to Italy. Obviously,as long as the results of the excavations are not fully published, one will have to wait for more elaborate and far-reaching conclusions, but for the time being and considering the preliminary report,it seems quite likely that this camp was in use during the period which interests us more particularly,i. e. between 6 and 9 AD, quite probably as a supplyand repair base.
Not too far away, in the Sava river near Podsused,a Roman helmet of the Hagenau type (Coolus C) (fig. 2) was found, dated by H. R. Robinson to the late 1st century BC and the early 1st century AD. Although his early dating might be a matter of discussion,it is not at all unconceivable that the helmet could have been used during the Pannonian revolt. The incised inscription on the neck guard (CENTVRIA) TAVRI C. MESTRI CINNA(E) clearly shows that this helmet belonged to a Roman citizen, presumably a legionary.
Less than 20 km away, another Roman helmet (fig. 3) was found in the Sava river, near the village of Rugvica. It is also a Hagenau type and considering its small neck guard, it is quite probably an early production model. It could thus belong to the Augustan period. It is interesting to point out that four soldiers have left their names incised on the helmet:(CENTVRIA) C. TRVTTIDI, GAL(EA) C. OFELLI; (CENTVRIA) NAIVI, Q. TVL(L)I; (CENTVRIA) SEI,LVCRETI; (CENTVRIA) HEDI, L. PAPIRI. Three of them bear the so called duo nomina of the first manner,i. e. the praenomen and the nomen, a detail that would also point to an earlier dating.
Following the course of the Sava river, we arrive to the main Roman base of that time in western Pannonia,Siscia. A large number of Roman military artefacts have been found there and some of them can be dated with more or less certainty to the Augustan period. First of all, there are several helmets. One of them (fig. 4). Another Hagenau type helmet (fig. 5) was found during the dredging of the Sava river bed at Martinska Ves close to Sisak. Although this piece has a somewhat more developed neck guard compared to the last two specimens, it is also an earlier type and it could have been in use during the Pannonian revolt.It also has an incised inscription,(CENTVRIA) LVCCI(I), VARRONIS8.
Few museum exhibitions will be helpful to visualize the proper looking legionaries of Augustus- Claudius period.
Another specimen of military equipment to be presented here is a Weisenau type helmet (fig. 17) found in the Sava river near the village of Klakar, also called Klakarje in older publications27. H. R. Robinson considered it to be an early type (Imperial-ItalicB).From publication:Archaeological Traces of the Pannonian Revolt 6 –9 AD:Evidence and Conjectures Ivan Radman-Livaja – Marko Dizdar
One small lorica segmentata fitting (fig. 15) from Siscia also deserves to be mentioned in this context since it undoubtedly belonged to the earliest model of that type of armour, (the so called Kalkriese segmentata model) and of course the similar finding of VINDONISSA (present Switzerland).
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
The historical period (late Augustan period) is such that in legionnaires equipment dominated coolus helmets and chain mail armor.But the gallic helmets (some of the models) and lorica segmentata (the early version Kalkriese ,Vindonissa and Corbridge models) are relevant also.
I can not deny the existence of mass hinges which are also among the many artifacts that have been described as the first centuries specimens. These are so far unpublished material (my gift for my FB friends) form lorica segmentata parts from Published in the book “Finds of the Roman Military Equipment in Croatia. Editor: Ivan Radman-Livaja” .Оf course this is an insignificant part of the materials relate to Lorica Seg. that are published in book.
I can not be categorical on whether the Corbridge A and B seg.model were used in late August period, but most colleagues are equipped with this mass model so that it would be difficult to be discriminated in some potentially event .
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Аn interesting (in its content) collective coinage findings described in: Archaeological Traces of the Pannonian Revolt 6 –9 AD:
Ivan Radman-Livaja – Marko Dizdar
In 1886, a hoard of Roman denarii (fig. 18) was found on an unknown spot somewhere between Osijek and Valpovo. The head of the Archaeological Department of the National Museum in Zagreb,J. Brunšmid was informed about the discovery. According to the data Brunšmid managed to gather about that hoard, most coins were late Republican, dating to the 1st century BC with a few pieces from the 2nd century BC, as well as at least five coins minted by Augustus from 19 till 2 BC28.Those are obviously the most interesting coins for our subject because they provide us with a terminus ante quem non for the deposition. The hoard was certainly not hidden before 2 BC and considering the dramatic events which struck that area in 6 AD, we are inclined to believe that it is precisely at that moment that the owner of that money was compelled to hide it, in the hope to retrieve it later, when the situation calms down.This obviously did not happen and we may wonder about the fate of that man. One cannot forget the words of Velleius Paterculus when he describes the massacres of Roman citizens, most notably traders and military personnel who found themselves isolated at the outbreak of the revolt in the areas controlled by the rebels. One of those unfortunate souls might have tried to preserve his savings while trying to escape the wrath of the vengeful Breuci. It is not at all unlikely that this hoard was hidden by a Roman trader or perhaps a Roman soldier. It is after all not a negligible amount of money. Of course, it might have also been hidden few years later by a local, when Roman troops were retaking the area, probably by the most brutal means imaginable. Be it as it may, the years 6 to 9 AD seem to be the most plausible time frame for the deposition of that hoard.
Here I would like to make a parallel with a similar coinage finding from place Near the town Olfen in Germany. Near the town Olfen in Germany. But in a small amount. The important thing is that along with the coins was found a Roman helmet Montefortino type model-C !
From the publication we understand that finding (it is assumed) is from about year 7 B.C. at the time of Drvsvs- 9 A.D. (the father of Claudius).
Quote "Based on the findings, the scientists a precise dating. So is the compared to other Roman camps lip rather small plant have passed 11-7 BC.Consequently the camp was initial from the time of Roman occupation of Germania east of the Rhine and was used in the time of the Drusus campaign"
Italian language:
The question whether it is appropriate for this historic period to be used Montefortino helmet!? According to me and my humble opinion these early Montefortino helmets have not disappeared magically and possibly small amounts of them have been used in late August period. This is about tolerance of approximately 7 or 8 years (8,7 BC till 7,8 AD).
Publication from the Hermann AUKTION catalog.This figure shows the legionnaire from earliest August period. A good example.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
I will share one of my idea on which I thinking about from some time ago. It is regarding the finds from Village Karanovo -Municipality of Nova Zagora.Thracian Tomb in Bulgaria's archeological complex "East Hill" I century A.D. which includes Aureus from Imp.Tiberivs and much more artifacts exactly dated with the numismatic material. The latest coin is a Aureus from Imp.Tiberivs. The other coins are silver republican denarius.
There are a few guidelines by which I'm headed. Most importantly, it is buried Thracian warrior serving in the Roman army in the proven historical period (with this coin finds). By the weapon that was found in the burial is evident that he was and horseman. So it is entirely possible that this Thracian warrior is involved in suppressing of the Illyrian Revolt. It is explicitly described that a large Thracian cavalry participated in this event , sent appropriate for this military campaign from the Thracian king Remetalk.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Latin name which I use as a Roman reenactor most likely also is associated with this event.
My Latin name that I use In the club is dedicated to real person who lived at that time probably. Мy latin name in legion IIII SCYTHICA is Quintus Etuvius Sexti -from Vindobona-Centurio from IIII SCYTHICA in the time of Tiberius from Vindobona (present Vienna), who served 35 years with IIII Scythica (Dessau 9090) and and rise to ranks of Centurion. Hi was conscripted at the latest, in the time of Tiberius (for his offensive).
Centurio Q.Etuvius. Capreolus - Q(uintus) Etuvius Sex(ti)
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
I met this artifact from publication from the book Book “Roman Legionary AD 69-161”, associated with LEGIO XI CLAVDIA,XIII GEMINA and IIII SCYTHICA. The monument is probably related with the Illyrian revolt 6-9 years A.D.
Epigraphic monument referred to the Centurion who served in these 3 different legions and finally ended his career as a Hastatus Prior.
Epigraphy
Inscription: ---] / [---|(centurio) leg(ionis)] XI Claud[iae ---] / [--- |(centurio) leg(ionis)] XIII Gemin[ae ---] / [--- |(centurio) leg(ionis)] IIII Scythic[ae ---] / [--- has]tat(us) prior [---] / [---] et Florus [---Lyon.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
The only serious video I found on the subject but on Croatian language. Тo my delight Slavic Language which I understand perfectly.
https://www.youtube.com
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Glass Phalerae (blue glass) depicting (according to the author) Emperor Tiberius. The find is associated with the Great Illyrian Revolt. Published in the book “Finds of the Roman Military Equipment in Croatia. Editor: Ivan Radman-Livaja”
